New U.S. attacks on Iran: Why the crypto market was less shaken this time than expected

Publication date: July 9, 2026

On Tuesday evening, the U.S. military carried out another round of strikes against Iran, marking the second major escalation in less than two weeks. The U.S. Department of Defense reported striking more than eighty targets, including air defense systems and dozens of fast attack boats belonging to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard in and around the Strait of Hormuz. Iran responded with its own attacks on U.S. targets and once again threatened to close the strait, through which about 20 percent of the world’s oil passes.

This is exactly the kind of news that, according to the usual script, should trigger a major crypto sell-off. And that’s exactly what happened in the first few hours. But anyone who followed the developments in the days that followed saw something that didn’t quite follow the script: Bitcoin had already recouped most of its losses before the weekend even began.

content.featured_image_alt_text

The first blow: oil up, crypto down

The pattern immediately following the news was classic. Brent crude rose by more than 2 percent to over $75 per barrel, the dollar strengthened, and investors pulled out of risky assets. The total crypto market lost an estimated $50 billion in market value within twelve hours. Bitcoin slipped from an intraday peak of over $64,000 back to around $61,800, a drop of about 2.5 percent.


Notable, but not new: the riskier segment of the market was hit harder than Bitcoin itself. Hyperliquid lost over 3 percent, while XRP and Solana each lost about 2 to 5 percent. This is a familiar pattern during geopolitical shocks: the smaller and more volatile the coin, the harder the blow when investors rush for the exit.




An Unusual Recovery

A few days later, with tensions still unresolved and Iran once again threatening to close the Strait of Hormuz, Bitcoin was back above $62,000 on Thursday. Meanwhile, Brent crude oil climbed to nearly $79, marking a third consecutive day of gains, while gold actually fell. That’s an unusual combination: normally, oil and gold rise amid the risk of war, while crypto moves in the opposite direction. This week, Bitcoin only did so to a limited extent.

Market sentiment also improved. The Fear & Greed Index, which had been in “extreme fear” for forty consecutive days, climbed back to 27. That’s still fearful—not a shift toward optimism—but it is a clear step away from panic, despite a second military escalation during the same period.

 


Why Bitcoin Is Decoupling from Oil and Gold

Market analysts point to a shift that’s worth understanding. This week, Bitcoin seems to be behaving less like a purely risky asset that automatically drops with every piece of war news, and more like an asset that reacts to interest rate expectations: the so-called “yield curve” on the short end. Specifically, this means that Bitcoin is currently more closely correlated with movements in U.S. short-term Treasury bills than with the price of oil or gold—the traditional safe havens during geopolitical turmoil.


In addition, demand from institutional investors continued unabated. Bitmine, the company behind analyst Tom Lee, purchased another 40,000 ether this week, while daily ETF flows began turning positive again after earlier outflows. Support also came from Japan: the weakening yen is prompting Japanese companies to buy Bitcoin and XRP as reserves on their balance sheets—a form of demand that doesn’t disappear as soon as news about Iran takes a turn for the worse.

That doesn’t mean the geopolitical risk has disappeared. It does mean, however, that alongside sellers who panic at every headline, a layer of buyers has emerged that is systematically buying up the dip, which should make the impact less severe than it actually has been.


 

The level to watch: $60,000

Traders are currently focusing on the $60,000 threshold as the level that will determine which narrative prevails. If Bitcoin holds this threshold—even as tensions around the Strait of Hormuz continue to escalate—the argument that crypto has become structurally less sensitive to these kinds of shocks than it was a year ago will gain traction. If the price breaks sharply through it, then this week’s calm will turn out to have been mainly temporary, driven by luck in the timing of the news, not by a fundamental change.

For investors, this is a concrete benchmark to track—far more useful than the daily news about the next attack or retaliatory action. The conflict between the U.S. and Iran could simmer on for weeks, with ups and downs driving mainly oil and the dollar. The question that really matters to a crypto investor is not whether there will be another attack, but whether Bitcoin will continue to absorb those attacks without falling below $60,000.



Conclusion

As expected, the new U.S. attacks on Iran had an immediate negative impact on the crypto market: higher oil prices, a stronger dollar, and an outflow from risky assets caused a rapid decline. But the most striking news didn’t come during the attack itself; it came in the days that followed, when Bitcoin refused to follow the usual script and decoupled from the movements in oil and gold. Whether this is a temporary exception or the beginning of a structural shift in how the market prices Bitcoin will become clear with the next escalation.

 

 

Disclaimer: Investing involves risks. Our analysts are not financial advisors. Always consult an advisor when making financial decisions. The information and tips on this website are based on our analysts’ own insights and experiences. They are therefore for educational purposes only.

Experience it yourself!

Get our weekly analyses delivered to your inbox